Considerations of Aeroacoustics in Turbojet-Engine Testing
Recommendations for preventing aeroacoustic damage to test cells have been made.
A study of the aeroacoustics of a turbojet-engine test cell has been performed as one step in the development of a computational aeroacoustics capability (CAA) that could provide guidance for the design and operation of such cells. Ground testing of turbojet engines in test cells necessarily involves very high acoustic amplitudes, often severe enough to cause damage to test-cell equipment and to engines under test. Heretofore, the acoustic responses of test cells containing energetic jets have been poorly understood and generally unpredictable. The CAA capability is intended to enable prediction of deleterious acoustic events, making it possible to design test cells and choose operating conditions to prevent damage and thereby avoid the costly interruption of test schedules.


As a potential superior alternative to suppression or interruption, it has been proposed to design and construct cells to disrupt the duct modes that participate in super resonance. In particular, in the case of a hot circular-cross-section jet, the most amplified instability waves are those characterized by azimuthal wave number ±1. These are helical or flapping-mode jet waves that interact with acoustic waves in the corresponding helical and flapping duct normal modes. In principle, it should be possible to prevent super resonance by blocking the helical and flapping duct modes. This could be done by, for example, inserting barriers into the duct as shown in Figure 2.
Another product of the study is a set of recommendations concerning the development of a CAA capability for a turbojet-engine-testing laboratory. Summarizing the recommendations, the CAA capability should be developed and maintained by an in-house engineer, perhaps augmented with an engineering assistant who preferably has some expertise in CAA and/or computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The engineer and/or the assistant (perhaps augmented with consulting engineers having CAA and/or CFD expertise) should develop a battery of special-purpose CAA computer codes, each optimized for a specific class of CAA problems.
This work was done by Christopher Tam of Florida State University for the Air Force Research Laboratory. AFRL-0057
This Brief includes a Technical Support Package (TSP).

Considerations of Aeroacoustics in Turbojet-Engine Testing
(reference AFRL-0057) is currently available for download from the TSP library.
Don't have an account?
Overview
The document titled "Engine Test Cell Aeroacoustics and Recommendations" is a final report prepared by Dr. Christopher Tam from Florida State University, under the auspices of the Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC) and the Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC). The research was conducted to address the challenges associated with aeroacoustics in engine test cells, particularly focusing on noise prediction and resonance suppression.
The report details extensive comparisons between semi-empirical noise prediction formulas and experimental measurements, demonstrating that the predictions align well with actual data across various conditions, including both hot and cold jets and different expansion states. The nozzle design Mach number and fully expanded jet Mach number were tested within a range of 1.0 to slightly over 2.0, yielding satisfactory results for engineering applications.
A significant portion of the report is dedicated to the phenomenon of super resonance, which can cause severe structural damage to test cells if not controlled. The document outlines methods for suppressing super resonance, including the use of large quantities of water to dampen vibrations and the installation of Helmholtz resonators tuned to the resonance frequency, which have proven effective in reducing resonance amplitude.
The report emphasizes the importance of further testing to enhance the confidence in the semi-empirical theory used for noise predictions, as the current data set is limited. It suggests that additional research could provide more robust validation of the theoretical models.
Overall, the document serves as a comprehensive resource for understanding the complexities of aeroacoustics in engine testing environments. It provides practical recommendations for mitigating noise and resonance issues, ensuring that engine development processes can proceed without interruption. The findings are particularly relevant for engineers and researchers involved in aerospace testing and development, offering insights that can lead to improved testing methodologies and enhanced engine performance.
In conclusion, this report not only presents valuable experimental data and theoretical insights but also highlights the critical need for ongoing research in the field of aeroacoustics to support the advancement of aerospace technologies.
Top Stories
INSIDERRF & Microwave Electronics
FAA to Replace Aging Network of Ground-Based Radars
PodcastsDefense
A New Additive Manufacturing Accelerator for the U.S. Navy in Guam
NewsSoftware
Rewriting the Engineer’s Playbook: What OEMs Must Do to Spin the AI Flywheel
Road ReadyPower
2026 Toyota RAV4 Review: All Hybrid, All the Time
INSIDERDefense
F-22 Pilot Controls Drone With Tablet
INSIDERRF & Microwave Electronics
L3Harris Starts Low Rate Production Of New F-16 Viper Shield
Webcasts
Energy
Hydrogen Engines Are Heating Up for Heavy Duty
Energy
SAE Automotive Podcast: Solid-State Batteries
Power
SAE Automotive Engineering Podcast: Additive Manufacturing
Aerospace
A New Approach to Manufacturing Machine Connectivity for the Air Force
Software
Optimizing Production Processes with the Virtual Twin



