Using Electric Vehicle Batteries for Solar Energy Farms
Battery reuse systems could be profitable for both electric vehicle companies and grid-scale solar operations.
As electric vehicles rapidly grow in popularity, there soon will be a wave of used batteries whose performance is no longer sufficient for vehicles that need reliable acceleration and range. New research shows that these batteries could still have a useful and profitable second life as backup storage for grid-scale solar photovoltaic installations, where they could perform for more than a decade in this less demanding role.
As a test case, researchers examined a hypothetical grid-scale solar farm in California. They studied the economics of several scenarios: building a 2.5-megawatt solar farm alone, building the same array along with a new lithium-ion battery storage system, and building it with a battery array made of repurposed EV batteries that had declined to 80 percent of their original capacity — the point at which they would be considered too weak for continued vehicle use. They found that the new battery installation would not provide a reasonable net return on investment but a properly managed system of used EV batteries could be a good, profitable investment as long as the batteries cost less than 60 percent of their original price.
The study used a semiempirical model of battery degradation, trained using measured data, to predict capacity fade in the lithium-ion batteries under different operating conditions and found that the batteries could achieve maximum lifetimes and value by operating under relatively gentle charging and discharging cycles — never going above 65 percent of full charge or below 15 percent. This finding challenges some earlier assumptions that running the batteries at maximum capacity initially would provide the most value.
The study made a conservative assumption that the batteries would be retired from their solar-farm backup service after they had declined down to 70 percent of their rated capacity, from their initial 80 percent (the point when they were retired from EV use). Continuing to operate down to 60 percent of capacity or even lower might prove to be safe and worthwhile.
The actual economics of such a project could vary widely depending on the local regulatory and rate-setting structure; for example, some local rules allow the cost of storage systems to be included in the overall cost of a new renewable energy supply for rate-setting purposes, while others do not.
For more information, contact Karl-Lydie Jean-Baptiste at
Top Stories
INSIDERAerospace
Airbus Tests Low Cost Missile on New Bird of Prey Interceptor Drone
Technology ReportAutomotive
Borg Warner to Supply Integrated Drive and Generator for EREV Trucks
NewsPower
Detroit Unveils Gen 6 Heavy-duty Diesel Lineup
INSIDERDesign
Shipboard Motion Platform Simulates Additive Manufacturing at Sea
Road ReadyAutomotive
The Electric Mercedes G-Wagon, a Pricey Joy
Technology ReportPower
Webcasts
Electronics & Computers
Driving Reliability: Simulation Driven EMI Techniques for Modern...
Software
Smarter Aerospace Manufacturing & Design with Digital Twins and...
Power
2026 Battery & Electrification Summit (Online)
Automotive
SAE Automotive Podcast: V2X Vehicle Communications
Aerospace
How the F-22 Is Getting Software Updates Faster Than Ever



