Characterization of High-Temperature Polymer Thin Films for Power Conditioning Capacitors
High-temperature capacitor dielectrics in power electronics increase with the electrification of military propulsion and weapons systems.
Wide bandgap semiconductors (e.g., silicon carbide) will enable operation of military systems at temperatures above 150 °C, which eases thermal management. However, such systems cannot be designed efficiently unless capacitors are available that can operate at similarly high temperatures.
Metallized polymer film capacitors have the advantage of self-healing, which allows graceful failure, i.e., a gradual loss in capacitance, rather than catastrophic failure as in ceramic capacitors. As a result, the capacitor dielectric can be operated at an electric field near the dielectric breakdown strength, thus achieving higher energy density. The state of the art in capacitor films is biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP), which has a low loss (tan δ~1x10-4) that is independent of frequency, and a high dielectric strength (~700 MV/m). The disadvantage of BOPP is that at temperatures above 85 °C, the operating voltage must be derated, and the maximum operating temperature is limited to about 105 °C.
Poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and poly(ether imide) (PEI) are two commercially available thin films (<12 μm) that are candidates for high-temperature applications, as their glass transition temperature is above 150 °C. This work characterizes these two polymer films over a wide range of temperatures and compares them to BOPP and PPS.
The materials studied were 12 μm (nominal) PEEK from Victrex, 6 μm (nominal) PEI from General Electric, 9 μm (nominal) PPS from Toray, and 7 μm (nominal) BOPP from Kopafilm. PPS and BOPP were used as benchmarks.
Based on the results of breakdown strength measurements, PEEK and PEI appear to offer no improvement over PPS, from which capacitors are already available. However, results from dielectric loss measurements seem to indicate that PPS has a greater electrical conductivity at 200 °C than PEEK or PEI. Moreover, PEI has a lower loss than PEEK at temperatures above 150 °C and frequencies higher than 1 kHz. Therefore, PEI appears to be the better candidate for power conditioning capacitors.
This work was done by Janet Ho and Richard Jow of the Army Research Laboratory. For more information, download the Technical Support Package (free white paper) at www.defensetechbriefs.com/tsp under the Materials category. ARL-0079
This Brief includes a Technical Support Package (TSP).

Characterization of High-Temperature Polymer Thin Films for Power Conditioning Capacitors
(reference ARL-0079) is currently available for download from the TSP library.
Don't have an account?
Top Stories
INSIDERSoftware
The Future of Aerospace: Embracing Digital Transformation and Emerging...
INSIDERMaterials
Clean Sky Demonstrator Fuselage Shows Potential of Thermoplastics in Aircraft...
INSIDERTest & Measurement
Blue Origin Rocket Reaches Intended Orbit on First Launch
NewsAutomotive
AVSC Develops Best Practices for Traceable AV Safety Inspection Protocols
INSIDERRF & Microwave Electronics
First F-15Es Equipped With EPAWSS Ready for Flight
NewsPower
Webcasts
Software
Navigating Security in Automotive SoCs: How to Build Resilient...
Propulsion
Is Hydrogen Propulsion Production-Ready?
AR/AI
AI-Powered Quality Control for Sustainable Automotive Production
Aerospace
Improving Thermal Management for Aerospace and Defense Electronics
Connectivity
The Road Ahead for Next-Gen E/E Architectures: Trends and...
Software
Department of Defense Contracts Denied: New Cybersecurity Rules...