Energy-Scalable Protocols for Battery Operated Micro Sensor Networks

Sensor network protocols designed with low-power techniques can prolong the lifetimes of wireless sensor systems.

Networks of microsensors can greatly improve environment monitoring for many civil and military applications. Multiple sensors provide fault tolerance and can provide valuable inferences about the physical world to the end user. In order to prolong the lifetimes of wireless sensors, all aspects of a sensor system should be energy efficient. To maximize battery lifetimes of distributed wireless sensors, network protocols and data fusion algorithms should be designed with low-power techniques. Network protocols minimize energy by using localized communication and control and by exploiting computation/communication tradeoffs. A sensor network system that uses a localized clustering protocol and beamforming data fusion was developed to enable energy-efficient collaboration.

Direct Communication between the sensors and the end user is extremely energy-intensive. (a) Direct communication with the base station; (b) multihop communication with the base station; and (c) clustering algorithm. The grey nodes represent “cluster heads,” and the function f(A,B,C) represents the data fusion algorithm.
A network protocol layer allows for sensor collaboration. If the distance between neighboring sensors is less than the distance between the sensors and the end user, then transmission power can be saved if the sensors collaborate locally. A clustering communication protocol was developed whereby sensors communicate with a local control center (called a “cluster head”). Since it is likely that the sensors in the local cluster share highly correlated data, the cluster head aggregates the data and then transmits the aggregate data to the end user. In addition to reducing transmission power, effective data aggregation can improve signal enhancement, detection, and classification.

Beamforming is one method of combining data from multiple sensors in order to satisfy a given performance criteria. The advantage of beamforming is that the desired signal is enhanced while the uncorrelated noise is reduced, which in turn improves detection and classification of the source. An extension of beamforming also allows for source localization and tracking. However, beamforming algorithms are computationally complex, often involving matrix operations, and this large amount of computation results in large power dissipation. Thus, there are tradeoffs between performance and power dissipation that should be considered when implementing beamforming algorithms for sensor networks.

Often, sensor networks are used to monitor remote areas or disaster situations. In both these scenarios, the end user cannot be located near the sensors. Thus, direct communication between the sensors and the end user (see figure (a)) is extremely energy-intensive. In addition, direct communication may not be feasible for large-scale sensor networks. If, for example, frequency-division is used (e.g., each sensor obtains a certain bandwidth in which to transmit data), the amount of information that can be sent from each sensor to the end user becomes negligible as the number of sensors increases, because each sensor’s bandwidth is reduced down to zero.

Since data from neighboring sensors will often be highly correlated, it is possible to aggregate the data locally using an algorithm such as beamforming and then send the aggregate signal to the end user to save energy. There is a large advantage to using local data aggregation (beamforming), rather than direct communication. A clustering algorithm utilizes the energy savings from data aggregation to greatly reduce the energy dissipation in a sensor system. In the algorithm, the sensors self-organize into local clusters. Each cluster has a cluster head sensor that receives data from all other sensors in the cluster, performs data fusion (e.g., beamforming), and transmits the aggregate data to the end user. This greatly reduces the amount of data that is sent to the end user and thus achieves a global energy minimization. Furthermore, the clusters can be organized hierarchically such that the cluster heads transmit the aggregate data to “super-cluster-head” nodes, rather than directly to the end user so as to further reduce energy dissipation.

In addition to minimizing energy dissipation, the clustering algorithm has several other advantages over traditional routing protocols. The clusters are self-organizing and use localized coordiation and control, which not only enables scalability of the network (as no reorganization of the network is required when nodes are added to the system), but also enhances the fault tolerance of the system. This protocol can easily handle trade-offs in computation and communication. If computation is expensive compared to communication costs, the network can have the cluster head transmit all data directly to the base station. On the other hand, if computation is cheap compared to communication costs, the cluster head can perform signal processing functions to compress the data from all the sensors in the cluster and transmit the compressed (aggregated) data to the end user.

This work was done by Alice Wang, Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, and Anantha P. Chandrakasan of Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the Army Research Laboratory. ARL-0135

This Brief includes a Technical Support Package (TSP).
Document cover
Energy-Scalable Protocols for Battery-Operated MicroSensor Networks

(reference ARL-0135) is currently available for download from the TSP library.

Don't have an account? Sign up here.